Supply Chain & Industrial Dependency Risk
Identifying structural dependencies before disruption, coercion, or scarcity reshape operations, costs, and strategic autonomy.
Global supply chains are no longer optimized systems — they are strategic vulnerabilities.
Industrial dependencies today are shaped by geopolitics, regulation, resource concentration, and policy leverage. What once appeared as efficiency is increasingly a source of exposure: production stoppages, regulatory pressure, price shocks, reputational risk, or loss of strategic optionality.
At José Parejo & Associates, we help boards and executive teams identify and manage critical industrial dependencies before they become operational or financial crises.
Our analysis goes beyond logistics or procurement.
We examine where dependency becomes leverage — and how geopolitical, regulatory, or institutional dynamics can weaponize supply chains.
This allows decision-makers to act upstream, while alternatives still exist. This area of work is part of our broader What We Solve framework.
Why This Risk Is Often Missed
Most organizations detect supply chain risk too late, because it is assessed through fragmented or purely technical lenses.
Common blind spots include:
Overreliance on Tier-1 supplier visibility
Lack of mapping of upstream geopolitical concentration (APIs, critical minerals, components)
Separation between regulatory analysis and operational planning
Underestimation of export controls, sanctions, or informal political pressure
False assumptions about market neutrality in critical inputs
As a result, dependency only becomes visible after disruption, cost escalation, or strategic constraint.
Core Areas of Exposure We Address
Critical raw materials and strategic minerals
Pharmaceutical APIs and healthcare inputs
Energy vectors and industrial feedstocks
Advanced manufacturing components
Food, agriculture, and essential commodities
(We adapt scope to sector and geography.)
How We Assess Industrial Dependency
We analyze supply chain exposure as a strategic risk, integrating:
Geographic concentration of critical inputs
Regulatory and sanctions exposure
Political leverage and informal state influence
Substitutability and time-to-diversification
Cost, quality, and continuity trade-offs
Impact on investment, expansion, or exit decisions
Our work produces decision-grade clarity, not generic monitoring.
How We Intervene
We intervene before dependency crystallizes into constraint.
Our work typically includes:
Structural dependency mapping (beyond Tier-1)
Scenario analysis linking geopolitics to operational impact
Early-warning indicators and trigger thresholds
Strategic options: diversification, redesign, timing, or controlled exposure
Executive and board-level briefings aligned with real decisions
We do not provide generic resilience frameworks.
We translate complexity into clear strategic options.
Confidential Briefing
For boards and senior executives facing industrial dependency with strategic implications, we provide confidential, decision-focused briefings tailored to sector, geography, and exposure profile.
When We Are Called
Organizations typically engage us when:
Critical inputs are concentrated in a small number of jurisdictions
Expansion or investment decisions depend on fragile supply chains
Regulatory or geopolitical shifts threaten continuity or pricing
Sanctions, export controls, or informal restrictions are emerging
Traditional audits fail to capture strategic exposure
Our role is to restore decision-making advantage where dependency is structural.
Strategic Services & Risk Intelligence (EN)
© 2025 JPA — Jose Parejo & Associates. All rights reserved.
